
换热器管子与管板接头拉脱力的研究
Pullout force study of tube-to-tubesheet joints in heat exchangers
通过试验和三维有限元分析研究了换热器中管子与管板连接的液压胀接、焊接以及胀焊结合接头(包括先焊后胀以及先胀后焊两种情况)的拉脱力大小和失效形式。有限元分析考虑了接头的几何非线性、材料非线性、接触非线性以及热固耦合,从而能模拟接头材料的弹塑性变形、热塑性以及先胀后焊过程中焊接热对胀接的影响。研究结果表明,焊接接头的拉脱力远大于液压胀接接头的拉脱力,并且略大于胀焊结合接头的拉脱力;对于先胀后焊或者先焊后胀接头,拉脱力并没有明显的变化;在拉力作用下,胀接接头的破坏主要是管子与管板接触面间的拉脱破坏,而焊接接头的破坏主要为焊缝的剪切破坏。
The pullout forces and failure forms of hydraulically expanded, welded, and expanded-and-welded (including expanding prior to welding and welding prior to expansion) tube-to-tubesheet joints in heat exchangers have been experimentally and numerically studied. Geometrical, material and contact nonlinearities, as well as coupling of heat and structure in the finite element analysis were considered in order to simulate the elasto-plastic and thermoplastic behaviors of the joint materials and the influence of the welding heat on the expanded connections. The results show that the pull-out force of the welded joint is much larger than that of the hydraulically expanded joint and even slightly larger than that of the expanded-and-welded joint. There is no significant difference between the pull-out forces of the joint expanded prior to welding and that welded prior to expansion. Under tensile loadings, the failure of the expanded joint was found to involve the pull-off damage of the tube and tubesheet connection, while the failure of the welded joint involved mainly a shear break of the welding.
[1]YOKELL S. Expanded, weldedandexpanded tubetotubesheet joints[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1992, 114: 157-165.
[2]匡良明. 静压胀管接头性能分析[J]. 石油化工设备, 1999, 28(2): 31-35.
[3]汪建华, 陆皓, 袁敏刚. 胀管接头的弹塑性有限元分析及其应用[J]. 压力容器, 1997, 14(5): 32-36.
[4]ALLAM M, BAZERGUI A. Axial strength of tubetotubesheet joints:Finite element and experimental evaluations[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2002, 124: 22-31.
[5]颜惠庚, 李培宁. 换热器的液压胀管研究(4)——胀接接头的拉脱力和压脱力[J]. 压力容器, 1998, 15(5): 25-28.
[6]李磊, 王海峰, 桑芝富, 等. 管槽结构尺寸对换热器管子与管板胀接性能影响的试验研究[J]. 压力容器, 2001, 18(5): 10-12.
[7]段红卫, 段成红, 钱才富, 等. 管孔开槽对液压胀接接头强度影响的实验研究[C]∥教育部高等学校过程装备与控制工程专业教学指导分委员会. 第9届全国高等学校过程装备与控制工程专业教学改革与学科建设成果校际交流会论文集. 北京:化学工业出版社,2004: 494-496.
[8]王海峰, 桑芝富, 石庭瑞. 液压胀管数值模拟[J]. 石油化工设备, 2001, 30(3): 10-13.
[9]朱日良. 管壳式换热器管板与换热管焊接常见质量问题的防止[J]. 化工设备与管道,2005,42(1):62-63.
[10]JAWAD M, CLARKIN E, SCHUESSLER R. Evaluation of tubetotubesheet junctions[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1987, 109: 19-26.
[11]DUAN Chenghong, CAO Baogang, XU Hong. 3-D simulation of hydraulically expanded tubetotubesheet joint considering strain hardening effect,Bauschinger effect and temperature change effect[C]∥ASME. Proceedings of ICPVT-9, Sydney: ASME, 2000: 339-352.
[12]钱才富, 段成红, 于洪杰, 等. 液压胀接可靠性研究[J]. 高技术通讯, 2004, 14(增刊): 162-167.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |